Question:
can i boil the potato, then bake?
aurelia
2019-11-18 20:09:24 UTC
can i boil the potato, then bake?
25 answers:
anonymous
2019-11-21 00:47:18 UTC
nope..............................
anonymous
2019-11-20 23:42:45 UTC
yes of course you can, just make sure you drain all the water out
anonymous
2019-11-20 21:40:19 UTC
Yes ma'am.  You can also nuke a potato for a couple minutes before boiling or baking to save time.
anonymous
2019-11-20 21:05:54 UTC
yessssssssssssssssssssssss
denise
2019-11-20 02:47:30 UTC
For 'roast' potatoes, its best to par-boil them, drain and then roast in oil on a tray. For a Jacket baked potato, I'd stab it with a fork, M.wave for 8 mins, then bake it for about an hour.
CrustyCurmudgeon
2019-11-19 04:30:50 UTC
Of course you can, but why would you? You can oven roast them if you want a more substantial skin, or wrap them in foil if you prefer a softer skin. You can even make jacket potatoes if you oil the skin and bake on high for the first 20 minutes, then reduce the heat for 45 minutes.
YoshiHokage
2019-11-18 22:44:18 UTC
Its possible but i dont know how it will come out
anonymous
2019-11-18 22:07:24 UTC
Well yes, it's physically possible and you're welcome to so it so far as I'm concerned.
anonymous
2019-11-18 20:52:09 UTC
Yes, but only half cook it when boiling then the other half will cook while it's baking. 
anonymous
2019-11-18 20:11:40 UTC
Yes you can, my Mom used to do it all the time.
Andrew
2019-12-02 04:11:27 UTC
Of course you can. Just drain out the water first, then bake them in the oven.
anonymous
2019-11-24 18:31:30 UTC
Go ahead.......
?
2019-11-22 18:32:20 UTC
no.its bad idea..
anonymous
2019-11-21 22:47:45 UTC
Probably better to microwave first which is what I do. Give a decent size washed potato wrapped in a couple of sheets of kitchen roll about 5 mins on 1000W then let it cool while the oven heats up then bake for about 20 minutes. It speeds the cooking process up by quite a way so you can do it in about 30 mins instead of an hour and a quarter or so.
Zack
2019-11-21 10:30:05 UTC
Yeah man, that would be tasty. U can also boil potato and leave it in a skin. After u can go on a picnic, make a fire and drop potatoes in a coal. But make sure u drop it in a coal, not in fire. Its so tasty, my friend from Ukraine gave me that recipe
?
2019-11-20 15:23:25 UTC
 

 

 

  

Introduction 

Document 

Signers 

Related Information 

Jefferson's Account 

Declaration House 

Declaration Timeline 

Rev. War Timeline 

More Resources 

Lesson Plan 

  

 

 

 

  

The Declaration of Independence 

The Want, Will, and Hopes of the People 

 

Declaration text | Rough Draft | Congress's Draft | Compare | Dunlap Broadside | Image | Scan  

 

 

IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776 

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America 

hen in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. 

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world. 

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good. 

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them. 

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only. 

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures. 

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people. 

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within. 

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands. 

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers. 

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries. 

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance. 

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures. 

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power. 

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation: 

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us: 

For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States: 

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world: 

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent: 

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury: 

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences: 

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies 

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments: 

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever. 

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us. 

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people. 

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation. 

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands. 

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions. 

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people. 

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends. 

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor. 

New Hampshire: 

Josiah Bartlett, William Whipple, Matthew Thornton 

Massachusetts: 

John Hancock, Samuel Adams, John Adams, Robert Treat Paine, Elbridge Gerry 

Rhode Island: 

Stephen Hopkins, William Ellery 

Connecticut: 

Roger Sherman, Samuel Huntington, William Williams, Oliver Wolcott 

New York: 

William Floyd, Philip Livingston, Francis Lewis, Lewis Morris 

New Jersey: 

Richard Stockton, John Witherspoon, Francis Hopkinson, John Hart, Abraham Clark 

Pennsylvania: 

Robert Morris, Benjamin Rush, Benjamin Franklin, John Morton, George Clymer, James Smith, George Taylor, James Wilson, George Ross 

Delaware: 

Caesar Rodney, George Read, Thomas McKean 

Maryland: 

Samuel Chase, William Paca, Thomas Stone, Charles Carroll of Carrollton 

Virginia: 

George Wythe, Richard Henry Lee, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Harrison, Thomas Nelson, Jr., Francis Lightfoot Lee, Carter Braxton 

North Carolina: 

William Hooper, Joseph Hewes, John Penn 

South Carolina: 

Edward Rutledge, Thomas Heyward, Jr., Thomas Lynch, Jr., Arthur Middleton 

Georgia: 

Button Gwinnett, Lyman Hall, George Walton 

 

 

 

 

Start page | The Document | Signers | Related Information | Jefferson's Account | Declaration House Declaration Timeline | Rev. War Timeline | More Resources |  

 

 

 

 

Tweet  

 

 

 

 

 

  



 
Kenan H
2019-11-20 13:10:27 UTC
No, just turn it into some chips.
Maclver
2019-11-20 11:59:16 UTC
We lightly scrub our tatty's then in the oven with oil under ally foil. Cook for 45munutes then remove foil leave until roasted. Yes you could boil first but not fully cooked
john c
2019-11-19 23:37:52 UTC
Cooking is a creative art and science.  Partially boiling potatoes and then baking is a technique that is used regularly in large quantity cooking. Especially if you have a very tight timeline and you need to get the dish done quickly.  In a restaurant that serves breakfast, a normal routine is to boil whole potatoes until they are 3/4 done, slightly cook, peel the skins and slice or chop into cubes for home-fried potatoes. In this example the potatoes are first boiled then cooked on a griddle, seasoned with paprika, salt, pepper, and garlic and served with a variety of breakfast items.
anonymous
2019-11-19 18:08:14 UTC
It's a common technique called par-boiling.
anonymous
2019-11-19 13:48:19 UTC
Yes. Or microwave, then bake.
?
2019-11-19 13:02:02 UTC
You could,of course,but there is no good reason for it.Simply bake the potato from the start. Shouldn't pose a problem for you.
ckngbbbls
2019-11-19 03:53:43 UTC
why?

the time you waste boiling it first could be spent doing something else while that potato is busy baking in the oven.
?
2019-11-19 00:09:04 UTC
Yes, doing so will reduce the overall cooking time 
Donald K
2019-11-18 21:09:31 UTC
It's physically possible, so yes.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...